Search this site
Embedded Files
Vijñāna Parishad of India
  • Home
  • Vijñāna Parishad of India
    • Executive Council
    • Join Vijñāna Parishad of India
    • Life Members
    • Annual Members
    • VPI Annual Conferences
      • 26th Annual Conference - 2025
      • 25th Annual Conference - 2024
      • 24th Annual Conference - 2023
      • Sixth International Conference
      • Fifth International Conference and Golden Jubilee Celebration
      • 23rd Annual Conference - 2021
      • International Conference - 2020
      • International Conference and 22nd Annual Convention
      • 2nd International Conference
      • 21st Annual Conference
      • 20th Annual Conference
      • 19th Annual Conference
      • 18th Annual Conference
      • 17th Annual Conference
      • 16th Annual Conference
      • 15th Annual Conference
        • 15th Annual Conference Photo Gallery
    • Fellows and Awards
      • Best Paper Presentation Award To Young Scientists
    • Donors
  • Jñānābha
    • Jñānābha‎ Online Volumes
    • Volume 55 SI (No I-2025)
    • Volume 55 (No 1-2025)
    • Volume 54 (No 2-2024)
    • Volume 54 (No 1-2024)
    • Volume 53 (No 2-2023)
    • Volume 53 (No 1-2023)
    • Volume 52 (No 2-2022)
    • Volume 52 (No 1-2022)
    • Volume 51 (No 2-2021)
    • Volume 51 (No 1-2021)
    • Volume 50 (No 2-2020)
    • Volume 50 (No 1-2020)
    • Volume 49 (No2-2019)
    • Volume 49 (No1-2019)
    • Volume 48 (No2-2018)
    • Volume 48 (No1-2018)
    • Special Issue 2018
    • Volume 47 (No2-2017)
    • Volume 47 (No1-2017)
    • Volume 46 (2016)
    • Volume 45 (2015)
    • Volume 44 (2014)
    • Volume 43 (2013)
    • Volume 42 (2012)
    • Volume 41 (2011)
    • Volume 40 (2010)
    • Volume 39 (2009)
    • Volume 38 (2008)
    • Volume 37 (2007)
    • Volume 36 (2006)
    • Volume 35 (2005)
    • Volume 34 (2004)
    • Volume 33 (2003)
    • Volume 31, 32 (2002)
    • Volume 30 (2000)
    • Volume 29 (1999)
    • Volume 28 (1998)
    • Volume 27 (1997)
    • Volume 26 (1996)
    • Volume 25 (1995)
    • Volume 24 (1994)
    • Volume 23 (1993)
    • Volume 22 (1992)
    • Volume 21 (1991)
    • Volume 20 (1990)
    • Volume 19 (1989)
    • Volume 18 (1988)
    • Volume 17 (1987)
    • Volume 16 (1986)
    • Volume 15 (1985)
    • Volume 14 (1984)
    • Volume 13 (1983)
    • Volume 12 (1982)
    • Volume 11 (1981)
    • Volume 9/10 (1980)
    • Volume 8 (1978)
    • Volume 7 (1977)
    • Volume 6 (1976)
    • Volume 5 (1975)
    • Volume 4 (1974)
    • Volume 3 (1973)
    • Volume 2 (1972)
    • Volume 1 (1971)
  • News and Events
  • Contact Us
Vijñāna Parishad of India

Jñānābha‎, Vol. 55 SI (I) (2025), (64-72)

PREDICTING EARLY-STAGE CERVICAL CANCER USING MACHINE LEARNING: INTEGRATING COLPOSCOPY FINDINGS AND CLINICAL DATA


By

Rakesh Kumar Saini1, Neeraj Dubey2, Arvind Kumar Yadav3 and Shailendra Jain4*

1,3Department of Physics, Maharaja Chhatrasal Bundelkhand University, Chhatarpur, Madhya Pradesh, India 471001

2OSD, Higher education, Additional Director, Sagar Division, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India 470001

4Eklavya University, Near Toll Plaza Sagar Road, Damoh, Madhya Pradesh, India 470661

Email: rakeshsainidec79@gmail.com, drnd9024@gmail.com, ary4861@gmail.com, shailendra.jain@eklavyauniversity.ac.in

(Received: October 09, 2023; In format: May 21, 2023; Revised: June 27, 2025; Accepted: June 30, 2025)


DOI: https://doi.org/10.58250/jnanabha_SI.2025.55108


Abstract

Cervical cancer is a major global health challenge, with early detection playing a critical role in reduCIN g morbidity and mortality. This study investigates the application of machine learning models for the early-stage detection of cervical cancer, using colposcopic findings and clinical data. To predict cervical cancer outcomes, we compared the performance of two popular machine learning algorithms, Decision Tree and Random Forest. The models were trained on a dataset containing demographic, clinical, and colposcopic data, including factors such as HPV status, lesion grade, and lesion size. The performance of both models was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC). The Random Forest model outperformed the Decision Tree in all key metrics, achieving an accuracy of 89.6%, precision of 87.2%, recall of 84.5%, F1-score of 85.8%, and AUC of 0.92. In contrast, the Decision Tree model showed an accuracy of 81.4%, precision of 75.3%, recall of 72.8%,F1- score of 74.0%, and AUC of 0.85 . The results highlight that the Random Forest model is more effective at minimizing false negatives and false positives, offering improved predictive power for early cervical cancer  detection. These findings suggest that machine learning, particularly ensemble methods like Random Forest, can enhance clinical decision-making and improve early detection, thereby reducing unnecessary procedures and improving patient outcomes, especially in low-resource settings. Further

research is needed to incorporate additional data and refine these models for even greater accuracy and applicability in clinical practice.


2020 Mathematical Sciences Classification: 93B45.

Keywords and Phrases: Cervical cancer, colposcopy, early detection, machine learning, predictive modeling, Pap smear, HPV


[Download PDF File]

Google Sites
Report abuse
Page details
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse